Legal Opinion
Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 18, 1968No. 16995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In the instant equity receivership of the defendants, Penrose Industries Corporation and Sun Ray Drug Co., the District Court denied a petition of the appellant, The Joscar Company, a judgment creditor of Penrose, for leave to attach funds in the hands of the court-appointed appellee Conservator, or, in the alternative for an order directing the Conservator to satisfy Joscar’s judgment.
In denying the petition, the District Court, 293 F.Supp. 1116, after noting that Joscar’s judgment against the defendants had been obtained in a New York court on an unsecured claim, and had…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- American Surety Co. of New York v. FinletterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Warner v. Conn (Kopp)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Quinn v. Bancroft-Jones Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1926
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
4Cited by4 opinions
- SUNLAND MORTG. CORP. v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Taylor v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Monessen (Appeal of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Estel L. Taylor v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n Of MonessenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968