American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Circuit Judge.
Consequent upon the Interborough receiver’s application 52 for permission to dis-affirm the Manhattan lease, two important issues have been raised in these proceedings: First, applications have been made by the city and separately by^ the transit commission as the city’s agent, for leave to sue the Interborough, its receiver, and others in the state court for a declaratory judgment that the cessation of operation of through trains over elevated and subway routes, such cessation being the threatened' result of disaffirmance, would be a breach of Interborough’s obligations…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Diners Club, Inc. v. A. J. Bumb, Trustee of Dashew Business MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Special Jet Services, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Warner v. Conn (Kopp)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.