Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Strong

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1931No. 3955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the case as above).

By force of section 16 of article 16 of the Constitution and article 535 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1925, each stockholder in a banking corporation is liable for its debts “to an amount double the par value” of the shares he owns. By article 453 of said statutes the banking commissioner is authorized to collect debts due to an insolvent state bank in his hands for liquidation. By article 455 (as amended by Acts 40th Leg. [1927] c. 205, § 1, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 455) said commissioner is authorized, if necessary to pay the debts of such a bank, to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alsop v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  2. Runner v. DwigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Houston Nat. Exch. Bank v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Bennett v. Wilkes CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hill v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Wagner ex rel. Molner v. South Chicago Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. Shaw v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Wagner ex rel. Molner v. South Chicago Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API