Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Wilkes County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1927No. 5760PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

We are met at the threshold of this case by a motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions, because of lack of a necessary party as a defendant in error. The County of Wilkes, for the use of the National Bank of Wilkes, filed its petition for injunction and other relief against Bennett as State superintendent of banks, and the Washington Exchange Bank. Granade, as tax-collector of said county, intervened, and by proper order his intervention was allowed subject to the right of the “defendant” to demur thereto or to move to disallow the same. The defendants did not demur to this intervention nor…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bennett v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Berrien County Bank v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Bank of DawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Latimer v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Almond v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Latimer v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. Mobley v. PhinizySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API