Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wagner ex rel. Molner v. South Chicago Sav. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 16, 1944No. 8561Published

1DissentMajor, Circuit Judge

The opinion suggests tl: it the authorities favoring and opposing the authority to assign stock liability are about evenly divided. (I shall hereinafter point out that such is not the case.) Assuming, however, that the authorities are as the opinion indicates, we are free, so I would think, to decide the case in accordance with our sense of fairness and justice. In doing so, it is hardly necessary to apply any harsh names to either of the parties. There is nothing in the record to indicate but that they are both honest men, Molner attempting to make some easy money at the expense of Wagner,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Richardson Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Frank v. GiesyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Decker v. DomoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API