Legal Opinion
Hill v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 11, 1934No. 9395PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
South Texas Bank & Trust Company, one of the appellees herein, instituted this suit against appellant, Russell C. Hill, seeking a recovery in the sum of $1,000, together with interest, alleged to be due it as the assignee of James Shaw, banking commissioner and statutory receiver for the City-Central Bank & Trust Company. The sum sued for represented a 100 per cent, stock assessment against appellant as the holder of ten shares of stock, $100 par value each, of the capital stock of the City-Central Bank & Trust Company, which banking institution had been placed, by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chapman v. Guaranty State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Orndorff v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Austin v. Guaranty State Bank of FulbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rogers v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Saur v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Shaw v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Webster v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- R. F. Henry v. S. Texas Bank Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.