Legal Opinion

Paolini v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1946No. Civ. 12816PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OGDEN, J. pro tem.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when struck by a streetcar operated by the defendant Schmidling, a motorman, in the course of his employment by the defendant city and county. The trial was had before a jury which rendered its verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $20,000. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied and judgment in the amount of the verdict was rendered, from which judgment defendants appeal.

The accident occurred shortly after 4:00 o’clock in the afternoon of May 24, 1943. Although the sky was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Dalley v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Simon v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Dumas v. StockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Paxton v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API