Legal Opinion
State v. Kollar
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 31, 1920No. A-3023PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from County Court, Canadian County; R. B. Forrest, Judge. T. Kollar was charged with unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquors, and from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the information, the State appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.
On the 16th day of April, 1917, E. F. Maley, as county attorney of Canadian county, filed in the county court of said county an information against one T. Kollar, the charging part of which is as follows:
“That one T. Kollar, late of the county of Canadian and state of Oklahoma, on or about the 14th day of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seventeen, at and within said county then and there being, did then and there willfully and unlawfully have possession of intoxicating liquors, to. wit, four quarts alcohol, with the unlawful intent to then and there sell, barter,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Penn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Sellers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
- State v. VaughnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Skelton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Berg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- State v. La DueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Action Wholesale Liquors v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.