Legal Opinion
California Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1942No. 10020PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
In September, 1937, Neis A. Anderson, a citizen of California, made two contracts with the United States. Thereby Anderson agreed to construct in California certain buildings for the United States, and the United States agreed to pay Anderson therefor amounts aggregating $141,000. As required by § 1(a) of the Act of August 24, 1935, c. 642, 49 Stat. 793, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a(a), Anderson furnished to the United States two performance bonds in amounts aggregating $72,000 for the protection of the United States 1 and two payment bonds in amounts aggregating $70,-500 for the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bank of California v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- American Fidelity Company, a Corporation, and New Hampshire Fire Insurance Company, a Corporation v. National City Bank of Evansville, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Morrison Assurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.