Legal Opinion

Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1996No. S-6620, S-6920PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Florian Sever brought suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress, intentional interference with contractual relations, and violations of public policy, against his employer, Alaska Pulp Corporation, as well as individual officers and employees of the corporation, who refused to reinstate him because of his testimony before Congress. Summary judgment was granted against him on the public policy claims, and a jury found against him on the remaining claims. Sever now brings this appeal.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Florian Sever began working for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph Fenner, Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph FennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Shandon Inc. v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API