Mallott v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Jay B. Mallott was convicted by a jury of the rape of a three year old girl. He contends that his right against self-incrimination, and his rights to a fair grand jury proceeding, a fair trial, and an impartial petit jury, have been violated. He also *741appeals from the severity of the sentence imposed. While the issues presented have called for careful scrutiny, we affirm.
I
Admissibility of Incriminating Statements
On the morning of May 7, 1976, the Alaska State Troopers were summoned to the home in which the rape occurred. Trooper John McGhee arrived at 5:55 A.M., found Mallott…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Juneby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.