Legal Opinion

Hollenbach v. Schnabel

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1894No. 19248PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Seabls, C.

This is an action of claim and delivery, to recover possession of certain liquors sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant Schnabel, and which, it is claimed, were procured by fraudulent representations of defendant.

The cause was tried by the court, written findings filed, and judgment ordered in favor of defendant:

1. For the return of the property.

2. For the sum of seven hundred and twenty-one dollars and seventy-five cents, the value thereof, in case a return cannot be had.

Plaintiff moved for a new trial, and, his motion being overruled, appeals from the order denying such new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Blum v. SteinTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Withaup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Haaren v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Alkus v. Johnson-Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Barreiro v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API