Hinckley v. Ayres
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This case is a branch of the litigation which arose out of the settlement of the estate of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased. The general history of that litigation, and the leading facts upon which it was founded are sufficiently stated in the opinions of the court in Blythe v. Ayres, 96 Cal. 532, and Blythe v. Ayres, 102 Cal. 254; and they need not be here repeated. The present appeal is taken by defendant, “Alice Edith Blythe” (so called in the transcript by order of the lower court), from an order denying her motion for a new trial. She claims to have been the lawful wife of said Thomas H.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kilburn v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
- In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.