Legal Opinion
Paulos v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1934No. Docket No. 8700PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
Respondent Gus Paulos brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained in-a collision between a horse-drawn peanut wagon, driven by him, and an interurban car, owned by appellant Market Street Railway Company and operated by appellant M. Kenny. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in respondent’s favor and against appel lants for $6,500. The latter appealed from the judgment entered on such verdict, assigning as errors (1) the denial of their motions for a nonsuit and for a directed verdict, (2) the refusal to give certain…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Gillette v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Phillips v. Ogle Aluminum Furniture, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Mahnkey v. BolgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.