Legal Opinion

Howard v. Imes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1956No. 6 Div. 861PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

The complainant, Birmingham Trust National Bank, having in its possession certain funds claimed by respondent-appellee, Margaret B. Imes, and respondent-appellant, Walter L. Howard, as administrator of the estate of Daisy Marks Hughes, deceased, filed an original bill of inter-County, in Equity, for the purpose of pleader in the Circuit Court of Jefferson establishing the rightful claimant. Mrs. Imes filed an answer and cross-bill to which Howard, as administrator, demurred. The demurrer being sustained, Mrs. Imes amended her cross-bill. The administrator then demurred to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Van Steenwyck v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Drain v. Brookline Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Coolidge v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Kay v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Boehmer v. BoehmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Grahl v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. MATTER OF ESTATE OF BODMAN v. BodmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hendricks v. Grant County BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Weatherly v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re Wladyslaw Wszolek EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API