Legal Opinion

Drain v. Brookline Savings Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1951PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action of contract by writ dated April 30, 1948, brought in a District Court by Mary A. Sullivan, an insane person, against the Brookline Savings Bank to recover the amount of a “joint and survivor account” in the bank, standing in the names of Mary A. Sullivan and Daniel F. Carney. The bank interpleaded and Carney was made a party defendant. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) e. 168, § 36. After trial', on January 19, 1949, the judge found for the bank and made no express finding as to Carney. During the trial the plaintiff filed sixteen requests for rulings, most of which were denied by the judge.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Goldston v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Barttro v. Watertown Square Theatre, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BongarzoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Blanchette v. BlanchetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. T. L. Edwards, Inc. v. FieldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. David Manning, Jr. v. Ross Grimsley and the Baltimore Baseball Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. Howard v. ImesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API