Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Grahl v. Davis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1998No. 03S01-9701-CV-00011PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the conservator, Geneva Grahl, breached her fiduciary duty to the deceased conserva-tee, Lillie Davis, by allowing the conserva-tee’s husband, Omer Davis, to transact four certificates of deposit in which the conserva-tee had an interest and reinvest the funds into certificates of deposit held either solely in the name of Omer Davis or jointly in the name of Omer Davis and Geneva Grahl. After carefully considering the controlling authority, we have determined that Grahl breached her fiduciary duty by allowing Omer Davis to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Sloan v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Howard v. ImesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Smith v. HaireTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hendricks v. Grant County BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Estate of Ladd v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  2. In Re ArwoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
  3. Morrison v. PotterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Estate of Calvert Hugh FletcherTennessee Supreme Court · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API