Hall v. Dollarhide

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs below, and the defendant in error was the defendant. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff's sought, by their action, to cancel a deed made by Charles R. Hiall' in his lifetime which, upon its face, purported to convey to the defendant, Russell A Dollar-hide, land described as the south 54 acres of west half of southeast quarter of sec. 9, twp. 21 N., range 3 E. I. M., in Noble county. The deed is attacked in the first cause of action on the ground…