Legal Opinion

Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 18, 1979No. 1 CA-IC 2179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

The question in this Special Action-Industrial Commission is whether the evidence supports the hearing officer’s award granting a petition to reopen for a new, additional or previously undiscovered condition. We find that it does not and set aside the award.

Respondent employee Max E. Sterrett was injured in the course of his employment at Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc. on October 27, 1976 when he injured his back while lifting a cart loaded with boxes of meat. His workmen’s compensation claim was accepted for benefits and closed without perma*378nent disability by an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Garrote v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API