Legal Opinion

Bell v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 1980No. 1 CA-IC 2215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OGG, Chief Judge.

The question presented in this Special Action-Industrial Commission review is *537whether the petitioner’s attempt to reopen his workmen’s compensation claim is barred by the res judicata effect of decisions in prior proceedings before the Industrial Commission.

The history of the claim is as follows. In August 1971, the petitioner, a deputy sheriff, sustained a serious employment related injury when he was shot in the head. Dr. Hal Pittman, neurosurgeon, successfully performed brain surgery to remove the bullet from the right temporal lobe. The bullet fragmented on impact…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pascucci v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Crocker v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Aetna Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Perry v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Payne v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Bell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API