Aetna Insurance v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The sole issue on this review of an award of the Industrial Commission is whether a doctor’s testimony that a condition he believed to be temporarily disabling has, through the passage of time become permanently disabling, constitutes sufficient evidence of a “changed condition” to justify reopening.
The facts giving rise to this issue are not in substantial dispute. On May 29, 1973, the respondent employee, Gilbert Salazar, sustained an industrial back injury. The claim was accepted and benefits paid until November 6, 1973, when the claim was closed without…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- London v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Taylor v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Whitley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Terrell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pascucci v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Crocker v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Garrote v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Sneed v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Perry v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.