Garrote v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Judge.
This is a review of an Industrial Commission award denying benefits. The dispositive question is whether the hearing officer properly denied a reopening after finding that petitioner suffered from a disability which was in existence at the time of the prior closing of his claim but which had not been diagnosed by any doctor at that time. We hold that under the circumstances of this case, the hearing officer should have granted a reopening on the basis of a “previously undiscovered” condition, and we set aside the award.
The petitioner, Efren A. Garrote, suffered an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Aetna Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Taylor v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Cowan v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Bishop v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pascucci v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Crocker v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Perry v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.