Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.
This appeal by Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc. and its insurance carrier seeks to review a decision of the Industrial Commission finding that claimant, Max Sterrett, had a psy-chophysiological reaction engrafted upon an industrial injury, or, alternatively, that he had a previously undiscovered discogenic problem rather than a previously diagnosed spinal ligamentous strain. The Court of Appeals held that the award ordering a reopening of claimant’s case was not supported by any evidence and set the award aside. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 23, Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Hatfield v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Vance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982