Legal Opinion

Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1980No. 14732-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.

This appeal by Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc. and its insurance carrier seeks to review a decision of the Industrial Commission finding that claimant, Max Sterrett, had a psy-chophysiological reaction engrafted upon an industrial injury, or, alternatively, that he had a previously undiscovered discogenic problem rather than a previously diagnosed spinal ligamentous strain. The Court of Appeals held that the award ordering a reopening of claimant’s case was not supported by any evidence and set the award aside. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 23, Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hatfield v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Vance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API