Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1937No. 1631PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

By this suit Hoyt Walker seeks to recover against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company damages for injuries to' himself in the sum of $1,350 and to his wife in the sum of $1,250 as the alleged result of ptomaine poisoning from eating of the contents of a can of corn purchased from the defendant’s grocery store in Baird, Tex. Plaintiff’s petition_px&dieated his claim of defeñítañFsNIability on two grounds; implied warranty and negligence.

Upon the trial, after the court had overruled a motion by defendant for an instructed verdict, the case was submitted to a jury upon…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Walker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Worley v. International Travelers Assur. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Wright v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API