Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FUNDERBURK, Justice.
By this suit Hoyt Walker seeks to recover against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company damages for injuries to' himself in the sum of $1,350 and to his wife in the sum of $1,250 as the alleged result of ptomaine poisoning from eating of the contents of a can of corn purchased from the defendant’s grocery store in Baird, Tex. Plaintiff’s petition_px&dieated his claim of defeñítañFsNIability on two grounds; implied warranty and negligence.
Upon the trial, after the court had overruled a motion by defendant for an instructed verdict, the case was submitted to a jury upon…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Walker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Worley v. International Travelers Assur. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Wright v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.