Reynolds v. General Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The General Electric Company, a corporation, brought two actions in the Circuit Court to enforce its claim for a balance of account of $10,000, which was due to it for machinery which it had sold and delivered to the Revenue Tunnel Mines Company, another corporation. One of these actions was against the mines company for the balance of the account.
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The General Electric Company, a corporation, brought two actions in the Circuit Court to enforce its claim for a balance of account of $10,000, which was due to it for machinery which it had sold and delivered to the Revenue Tunnel Mines Company, another corporation. One of these actions was against the mines company for the balance of the account. The other was against Albert E. Reynolds and others, who were directors of the mines company, and was founded upon the indebtedness of the latter company, and upon the…
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge,
after stating the case as above, delivered! the opinion of the court.
If the plaintiff below was entitled to a directed verdict because it-was guilty of no breach of any warranty, as its counsel assert, the alleged errors in the refusals of the court to receive evidence, and to-submit instructions relative to the amount of damages of which the defendant's'complain, were not prejudicial, and will require no consid*553eration. The contention of the plaintiff will therefore first be considered. The only express warranty, which was in reality a condition and not a warranty,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McKinley v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- J. I. Case Plow Works v. Niles & Scott Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Goulds v. BrophySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Burgess v. FelixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Ice Cream MacH. Co., Inc. v. Pig'n WhistleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- G. M. C. Truck Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.