Legal Opinion

Keyes v. Humana Hospital Alaska, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1988No. S-1848PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

Petitioner Melanie Keyes challenges the constitutionality of AS 09.55.536, which provides for mandatory pre-trial review of medical malpractice claims by an expert advisory panel and makes the panel’s written report admissible in evidence at trial. She specifically argues that the statute deprives her of due process of law, impairs her right to a jury trial, and violates separation of powers principles by impermissi-bly delegating judicial power to members of the panel.

We hold that AS 09.55.536 survives constitutional muster and therefore affirm the superior…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Matter of K.L.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Diedrich v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API