Legal Opinion

Williams v. Village of Kenyon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1932No. Nos. 29,066, 29,067, 29,068, 29,069PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from the orders denying their motions for a new trial. There were four actions brought by and in behalf of taxpayers of the village of Kenyon, this state, against the village and its officers, and against certain defendants who had entered into contracts for the installation of the various units in a municipally owned and operated electric lighting and heating plant, to declare such contracts void and enjoin the defendants from performing the same. Findings were made in favor of defendants in each case. It is conceded that if the contract between the village and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. Hendricks v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Casto v. Town of RipleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API