Legal Opinion
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. Hatfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 17, 1973No. 44111PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary declaratory judgment involving the constitutionality of L. 1971, c. 702 (Minn. St. c. 462A). The act involves a comprehensive plan “to facilitate the construction and rehabilitation of housing projects for families of low and moderate income by providing for mortgage loans, development loans, and technical assistance to qualified housing sponsors to be used for construction and rehabilitation.” The act creates the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, hereinafter MHFA, to administer the act and prescribes the powers and duties of such…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State Ex Rel. West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. CopenhaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
- Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of PA 1966, No 346Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage Finance FundNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Interrogatories by the Colorado State SenateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- R. E. Short Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- John R. Grubb, Inc. v. Iowa Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.