Legal Opinion
Hendricks v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 9, 1940No. 32,409PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Plaintiff, Hendricks, a taxpayer, sues to enjoin the city of Minneapolis from entering into a contract for the installation of parking meters in a restricted area of its “loop” district. Reinforcing plaintiff, Mr. Collins intervened as a taxpayer claiming a special interest by reason of ownership of an automobile and tenancy in a building located in the proposed parking meter zone. From the order denying a temporary injunction, plaintiff and intervener appeal.
After investigation to determine their practicability, the city council decided to install automatic parking meters and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Harkow v. McCarthySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- City of Mankato v. FowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Davies v. Village of MadeliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Foster's, Inc. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Bibb v. ChambersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Kimmel v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Cassidy v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.