Legal Opinion

Casto v. Town of Ripley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. CC 500PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

W. E. Casto and R. A. Shinn, residents and taxpayers of Ripley, a municipal corporation, who sue on behalf of themselves and all other residents and taxpayers therein, seek to enjoin the corporation and the common council thereof from improving and extending its present water works by the issuance and sale of bonds to be retired from the revenue thereof, pursuant to chapter 26, Acts (First Extraordinary Session), 1933. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the bill, and, upon joint application of the parties, certified his ruling to this court under Code 1931, 58-5-2.

On October…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Bates v. State Bridge CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Searle v. Town HaxtunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. County Court of Marion County v. DemusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Board of Governors of West Virginia University v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. West Virginia Resource Recovery—Solid Waste Disposal Authority v. GillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Hall v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API