Legal Opinion
Camarena v. Meissner
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 22, 1999No. C 99-2473 SIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On December 10, 1999, the Court heard argument on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Because the parties have previously agreed that resolution of the preliminary injunction motion would be dispositive of the case, because the relief requested in the preliminary injunction motion is the same as the relief requested in the complaint, and because the evidence that this Court may consider in reviewing the INS’s decision is limited to the administrative record, this Court construes the motion for a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Walters v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Occidental Engineering Company v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miriam Eliu Yepez-Razo v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Morris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Yepez-Razo v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006