Legal Opinion
Miriam Eliu Yepez-Razo v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 2006No. 03-72005PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
Miriam Eliu Yepez-Razo (“Yepez-Razo”) petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that found her ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), Pub.L. No. 82-414, 66 Stat. 163 (June 27, 1952), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We conclude that the BIA erred when it found that Yepez-Razo was not “lawfully residing” in the United States for purposes of section 212(h) from January 15, 1995 to June 13,1995.
I
Yepez-Razo, a native and citizen of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hernandez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Camarena v. MeissnerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Vasquez De Alcantar v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Onwuamaegbu v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- ROTIMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
- Rotimi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.