Chitta R. Nanda, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TONE, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue before us in this diversity case is whether under Illinois law an automobile manufacturer has a duty so to design and to manufacture its product that its occupants will not be subjected to an unreasonable risk of injury if a collision occurs which is not itself caused by any defects in the condition of the automobile. We hold that such a duty exists in the circumstances of this case and affirm the District Court’s judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
The evidence, “when viewed in the aspect most favorable to” the plaintiff (Pedrick v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Cunis v. BrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Ernest A. WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Thomas Polk v. Ford Motor Company, Ethel Lee Marshall, Guardian v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Soden v. Freightliner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.