Legal Opinion

Chitta R. Nanda, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 25, 1975No. 73--1726PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

The principal issue before us in this diversity case is whether under Illinois law an automobile manufacturer has a duty so to design and to manufacture its product that its occupants will not be subjected to an unreasonable risk of injury if a collision occurs which is not itself caused by any defects in the condition of the automobile. We hold that such a duty exists in the circumstances of this case and affirm the District Court’s judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The evidence, “when viewed in the aspect most favorable to” the plaintiff (Pedrick v.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. Cunis v. BrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. United States v. Ernest A. WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Thomas Polk v. Ford Motor Company, Ethel Lee Marshall, Guardian v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Soden v. Freightliner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API