Legal Opinion

Potlatch Corp. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1995No. 94-910PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. filed a suit against Potlatch Corporation for negligence and breach of contract. The trial on the merits lasted six days. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial court denied defendant Potlatch’s motion for a directed verdict. At the close of the defendant’s case, defendant renewed its motion for a directed verdict. MoPac moved for a plaintiff’s directed verdict. The trial court denied both motions. After rebuttal each party moved for a directed verdict. The trial court again denied both motions. The jury returned a defendant’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wheeler Motor Co., Inc. v. RothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Spink v. MourtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Carr v. Suzuki Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Nabholz Construction Corp. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. First Commercial Trust Co. v. RankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. TB of Blythesville, Inc. v. Little Rock Sign & Emblem, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. Chevron U.S.A, Inc. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API