Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker
This is an appeal from a judgment on jury verdicts of not guilty.
Beatrice Hardman, both individually and as Guardian of the Estate of Susan Hardman, a minor, sued to recover for burns and bodily injuries alleged to have been incurred as a result of the use of a hair conditioning product manufactured and marketed by defendant under the name of Lanolin Discovery. A Second Amended Complaint was filed at the conclusion of plaintiff’s proof, adding to the negligence counts, two counts based on an implied warranty and two on an express warranty. These latter four counts were taken from the jury.
Plai…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Anderson-Weber, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. TuohyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- People v. CarbonaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Rhodes Pharmacal Co. v. Continental Can Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.