Tucson Industries, Incorporated v. Schwartz
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Chief Justice.
Helen Schwartz, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, sued Wilhold Glues, Inc., Walter N. Boysen Company, Entz-White Lumber and Supply, Inc., Tucson Industries, Inc., Ann Chamberlin, and William Bolon, for convenience hereinafter referred to as Wilhold, Boysen, White, Tucson Industries, Chamberlin, and Bolon, respectively. Plaintiff recovered a $75,000 judgment against all six defendants and all appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed as to the first three, and reversed and remanded as to the last three. Its decision is reported at 15 Ariz.App. 166, 487 P.2d 12. Petitions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Olson v. Prosoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.