Legal Opinion

C.D.S. Diversified, Inc. v. Franchise Finance Corp. of America

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 4, 1991No. CV-89-2887(ADS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

May the Court assert pendent-party jurisdiction over a defendant in a diversity action when the amount in controversy on the claim asserted against that defendant is concededly below the requisite jurisdictional amount?

For the reasons that follow, this Court is of the view that it may not.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are derived from the plaintiffs’ amended complaint:

Plaintiff C.D.S. Diversified, Inc. (“CDS”), is a New York corporation having its principal place of business in the State of New York. The defendant Ticor Title Insurance Company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Irwin v. MascottDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  3. Lindsay v. KvortekDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Jones v. Woody (In Re W.J. Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
  5. Henkel v. ITT Bowest Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API