Legal Opinion

Henkel v. ITT Bowest Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 19, 1994No. 94-4116-SACPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Judge.

On May 25, 1994, the plaintiffs filed a petition in the District Court of Jewel County, Kansas. Briefly summarized, the petition alleges that Ceres Henkel, tendered to ITT Bowest Corporation, a financial services corporation, a check in full payment of her mortgage loan. 1 ITT is a mortgage servicer; the holder of the mortgage is the F.D.I.C. Henkel then sold part of the property, which had been mortgaged to the F.D.I.C., for $28,-000, receiving an earnest money check in the amount of $2,000. Reiter Land Company, as real estate agent for Henkel, held…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Larry Leonhardt, Dan Laursen, and Rick Rodriquez, Rodriquez Farms, Inc. v. Western Sugar Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Borgeson v. Archer-Daniels Midland Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
  4. Free v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Waters v. GrosfeldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API