Legal Opinion
Lindsay v. Kvortek
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 12, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-2076PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
STANDISH, District Judge.
On June 15,1994, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accor dance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on August 4, 1994, recommended that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count II of Amended Complaint and to Strike plaintiffs punitive damages claim be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- In Re Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Sayre v. PottsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
- Reason v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.