Legal Opinion
State v. Stilling
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1979No. C 76-08-11946, CA 7651, SC 25737PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. His conviction was appealed to and affirmed by the Court of Appeals, State v. Stilling, 31 Or App 703, 571 P2d 184 (1977). Review was allowed to determine (1) whether the trial court erred in giving an instruction to the jury which states that there is a disputable presumption that one intends the ordinary consequences of one’s voluntary acts and that an unlawful act is done with an unlawful intent and that the jury may infer intent in accordance with this rule, and if error, whether it was harmless; (2) whether…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Fenelon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.