Legal Opinion
In Re Trester
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 7, 2007No. 98,103PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,-.
This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the Disciplinary Administrator against respondent, Irwin S. Trester, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas in 1968. A hearing panel of the Kansas Board for the Discipline of Attorneys conducted a formal hearing, as required by Kansas Supreme Court Rule 211 (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 284).
The hearing panel concluded that Trester violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC) as follows: KRPC 5.5(a) (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 494) (unauthorized practice of law); KRPC 8.4(b) and (c) (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 510)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re LoberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Harris-SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- In Re ComfortSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re BishopSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- In Re FrahmSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- In re HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- In re HawkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- In re BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.