In Re Bishop
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam-.
This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against respondent, Patrick S. Bishop, of Fort Scott, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas in 1979. A hearing panel of the Kansas Board for the Discipline of Attorneys conducted a formal hearing, as required by Kansas Supreme Court Rule 211 (2007 Kan. Ct. R. An-not. 304).
The healing panel concluded that Bishop violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC) as follows: KRPC 1.1 (2007 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 384) (competence); KRPC 1.3 (2007 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 398)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lee Builders, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- In Re ComfortSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- In Re BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- In Re TresterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- In Re KelloggSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re MintzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- In re Hawver (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- In Re JohanningSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- In Re MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- In re HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.