Legal Opinion

Lenahan v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1939No. L. A. 17024PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the same has become moot.

On the 14th day of July, 1938, there was filed in the office of the city clerk of the city of Los Angeles a recall petition containing approximately 120,000 signatures and demanding the submission to the electors of the city of Los Angeles of the question whether Frank L. Shaw, the mayor of said city, should be removed from his office and, if recalled, his successor be elected. Pursuant to the duties imposed upon him by the city charter, the city clerk examined the recall petition and ascertained and declared…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lindstrand v. EmmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dietz v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Conran v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Bradley v. VoorsangerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Johnson v. DoslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Nicolopulos v. City of LawndaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Costa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wederath v. BrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Chase v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API