Neumeier v. Sperzel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
This was an action to recover a broker’s commission on the sale of defendant’s residence in Minneapolis. There was a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant’s alternative motion for judgment or a new trial was denied, and he appeals from the resulting judgment.
Viewing the facts in the light of the evidence upon which the verdict is founded, we find these to be substantially as follows: Plaintiff now is and for many years has been engaged in the business of selling real property. He is also engaged in the business of insurance and building construction. As a matter of fact,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Steidl v. McClymondsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Carney v. John Hancock Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Smith v. Philip B. Hunt Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spring Co. v. HolleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- David Kend v. Chroma-Glo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Rees-Thomson-Scroggins, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Gunderson v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Savage v. Kaiser Motors Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.