Legal Opinion
Spring Co. v. Holle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1956No. 36,794, 36,864PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action by The Spring Company, a corporation engaged as a real estate broker in Minneapolis, against defendants, Spencer F. Hollé and Jack J. Beugen, for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff because of their actions in interfering with and invading plaintiff’s rights under a listing agreement executed by Hollé, where- under he agreed to pay plaintiff a commission on the sale of his house. The house was sold by Hollé to Beugen for $35,000. It is plaintiff’s claim that it produced Beugen as a prospective purchaser and that it was the procuring cause of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Johnson v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Swaney v. CrawleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- American Surety Company, a Corporation, and Frank W. Rohlik v. Frank SchottenbauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Banner Realty, Inc. v. TurekArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Continental Research, Inc. v. Cruttenden, Podesta & MillerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1963
- F. D. Hill & Co. v. WallerichWashington Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.