Legal Opinion
Savage v. Kaiser Motors Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1955No. Civ. No. 1405PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages in the sum of $202,846.64. The action is based on a contract1 making plaintiff defendant’s exclusive agent and advisor in procuring iron ore from the Lake Superior iron mining district for the operation of defendant’s blast furnace in Cleveland, Ohio, variously referred to as “No. 5” and “Plancor 257”, and hereinafter referred to as No. 5.
Following execution of the contract, plaintiff alleges that defendant arranged with Republic Steel Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Republic) for the operation of No. 5 by Republic and that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Maple Island Farm, Inc. v. BitterlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Steidl v. McClymondsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Carney v. John Hancock Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Neumeier v. SperzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaiser Motors Corporation v. Mary F. Savage, as of the Estate of John A. Savage, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Carpenter v. BradyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1965