Legal Opinion

Rees-Thomson-Scroggins, Inc. v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1967No. 40375PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

A municipal court jury awarded plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, $3,150 as a commission for selling defendants’ home. The award was based upon a. finding that plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale. In response to a post-trial motion, the trial court granted defendants judgment notwithstanding the verdict essentially upon the ground that in view of the applicable principles of law the evidence did not justify the jury’s finding. We affirm.

The essential facts are not in dispute. Defendants, sometime prior to 1962, purchased their home for $52,000, and in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rosenfield v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Shuler v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Leimbach v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Real Estate Enterprises v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Neumeier v. SperzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David Kend v. Chroma-Glo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Mayberry v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Development Services, Inc. v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Sterling Investments, Inc. v. PotthoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API