McKee v. Board of Education
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendants1 appeal from a judgment of the trial court reversing a decision of the Watertown board of education (board) terminating the plaintiffs employment. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court impermissibly substituted its judgment for that of the board. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are undisputed. The plaintiff was a tenured teacher employed as a guidance counselor by the Watertown board of education.2 The plaintiff holds a standard certification issued by the state of Connecticut certifying him as a school guidance counselor for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Rado v. Board of Education of the Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Tucker v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Greenburg v. GreenburgConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Kronholm v. KronholmConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Connecticut Employees Union Independent, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Harhay v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Sekor v. Ridgefield Board of Education, No. 31 51 84 (Jul. 14, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995