Legal Opinion
Rado v. Board of Education of the Borough of Naugatuck
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 4, 1990No. 14057PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff, William Rado, Jr., a tenured teacher, appealed, pursuant to General Statutes § 10-151 (f),1 from the decision of the defendant board *543of education terminating his employment as a physical education teacher and director of athletics at the Naugatuck High School. The trial court affirmed the decision of the board and dismissed the appeal. The plaintiff has appealed from that judgment, claiming three grounds for reversal: (1) certain evidence of the plaintiffs misconduct was barred by General Statutes § 54-142a (a),2 concerning the erasure of criminal records, and was improperly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schweiker v. McClureSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Clisham v. Board of Police Commissioners of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Boyles v. PrestonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Rogers v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.