Legal Opinion
Kronholm v. Kronholm
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 13, 1988No. 5823; 6167PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
Both parties have appealed from post-judgment orders arising out of the financial orders made as a part of the judgment dissolving their marriage. We find error in part.
The issues presented in the plaintiffs appeal are whether the trial court erred (1) in interpreting the parties’ separation agreement as providing that the $190,000 lump sum alimony payment should go into a trust for the benefit of the parties’ children, rather than to the plaintiff outright, and (2) in finding that the terms of that agreement were not reasonably open to more than one interpretation, thus refusing to allow the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Cody v. Remington Electric ShaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Caracansi v. CaracansiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Maier v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- On Site Energy Corp. v. Sperry Rand Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eye Associates, P.C. v. Incomrx Systems Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Murphy, Inc. v. RemodelingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- DeMatteo v. DeMatteoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Larson v. JacobsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Ballato v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.